Attack, Defence and the Quest for Balance

The 2011/12 Premier League season:  A season voted the best ever in the league’s 20 year history (in its current guise). While one may argue that the outright level of quality wasn’t at its highest this season, no-one can deny the sheer amount of excitement generated throughout culminating in an exhilarating end at the Etihad stadium. The moment the ball left Kun Agüero’s right foot and hit the back of the net encapsulated this in an instant. Mass euphoria for the blue half of Manchester. Heart-wrenching despair for the red half. Football at its dramatic best.

Some are fascinated by the minutiae of tactical changes over the course of a game while the heartbeats of others are raised by a good, old-fashioned crunching tackle. The staple diet of the majority, however, is goals and there were plenty this season. In fact, Agüero’s late effort was the 1065th goal of this remarkable campaign, a record for a 20-team Premier League season. As you’d expect on the back of that an exceptionally high 2.81 goals per game were scored, the highest ratio in the English top-flight since magic picture boxes were still showing black and white images (3.03 in 1967/68). Which begs the question, what were the defenders doing?

There’s no doubt, in my mind at least, that there are still players highly skilled in the art of defending playing in the Premier League. Vincent Kompany and Joleon Lescott formed an impressive pairing at the back for Manchester City and along with Joe Hart were a key reason for their title success this season. Other players once derided even by portions of their own fans, Jonny Evans and Laurent Koscielny, have shown fantastic improvement this season and become vital components in their respective teams’ defensive phase. In contrast to Liverpool’s woes in front of goal, Martin Skrtel has proved to be a rock in a defence that allowed the opposition the fewest shots on target of any Premier League club this season (132).

Fabricio Coloccini’s fine season was acknowledged with a place on the PFA Players’ Player Team of the Year, Pablo Zabaleta was his usual reliable self whenever called upon by Roberto Mancini while Younes Kaboul’s performances have resulted in him being Harry Redknapp’s first choice pick at the heart of his defence and being awarded a provisional place in the France squad for Euro 2012. I could go on listing skilled Premier League defenders as there are many more but, in short, my point is that the individual quality is certainly there.

What isn’t there, at least on a regular basis, is efficient collective organisation. Consider the following results: Manchester City (final position 1st) 6 Manchester United (2nd) 1, Manchester United 8 Arsenal (3rd) 2, Arsenal 5 Tottenham Hotspur (4th) 2, Tottenham Hotspur 5 Newcastle United (5th) 0. These are remarkable results between teams who weren’t separated by that much in the final reckoning (gap between 2nd and 3rd apart). Granted, there were mitigating circumstances for some of these scorelines but on the whole they show a rather naïve tactical approach either in the initial setup of the respective losing teams or during the carnage.

These examples don’t even include Chelsea who themselves have been on different ends of cricket scores (albeit very low ones) in some of the ‘big’ games. Their 3-5 loss to Arsenal at Stamford Bridge earlier in the season was a prime example of excitement induced by kamikaze defending. Both sides gave master classes in how not to play a high defensive line. A lack of pressure higher up the field meant both defences were extremely vulnerable to even the most rudimentary long ball. The difference between the sides on that day, and where Arsenal won the match, was seeing this and making a change to rectify the initial error. The team in red dropped slightly deeper in the second half and weren’t as immediately susceptible to the long ball unlike their London rivals who were steadfast in their approach. André Villas-Boas was subjected to a lot of flak that day but his philosophy wasn’t the issue, it was more its implementation. Gradually, as he saw his squad weren’t willing to accept his methods, he adopted a more conservative approach but sadly for him the die had already been cast.

That away victory was one of many in the Premier League this season. 30.5% of games have ended in this fashion, higher than in any other Premier League season. It’s clear that managers have had a more offensive mindset when setting their team up which is another reason for the glut of goals this campaign. The rationale for this change in mentality is somewhat less clear-cut. It could be that the top teams seem, and in fact are, more vulnerable than they once were resulting in the ‘smaller’ clubs taking the handbrake off rather than travelling to the big grounds, parking the bus and waiting for the inevitable breakthrough.

Courtesy of The Independent

Premier League managers are also currently more progressive in their philosophy. The ambition of the ‘lesser’ clubs has meant an increase in attacking play throughout the league. There seems to be a greater number of teams adopting a certain ethos of playing, namely with the ball on the deck, and not altering that approach when they come up against sides they might traditionally expect to be battered by. Roberto Martinez’s Wigan, with their 3-4-3 and Brendan Rodgers’ Swansea with their 4-3-3 have both surprised opposition at times with their attacking transitions and technical quality on the ball. We’ve also seen this with other promoted teams in recent years.

Ian Holloway’s Blackpool devoted almost no time in their game to defending and though they paid for it in the end their attacking play brought them many plaudits and large scalps along the way. Paul Lambert’s Norwich are possibly an exception to this rule of sticking to one particular style. He’s a manager that often changes the shape of his team dependent on the opposition but the attacking intent generally remains. Despite only keeping 3 clean sheets all season, goals from all over the team helped them to reach the safe haven that is mid-table. The more success these types of teams have with this approach the more expansive styles will be integrated into the English game.

So, is Premier League defending dead? All the signs certainly point to it being in a lull at the moment. Gone are ‘the Mourinho years’ in which Chelsea’s defence was at its resolute best. Looking back it’s quite remarkable they only conceded 15 goals in the 2004/05 season. Mourinho’s success at Chelsea brought in a wave of cautious tactics across the league and a drop in the number of goals as a result. Managers adopted the thinking that it’s easier to destroy a masterpiece than create one and with José showing results could be gained with a controlled style why should they bother implementing a more open system? Of course, this generalises a bit. Mourinho’s Chelsea was hardly lacklustre. They were a well-drilled machine well capable of exploiting weaknesses in the opposition but what can’t be disputed is the fact that defence always came first.

This was something that Roberto Di Matteo grasped immediately when taking over the reins from Villas-Boas. Given the personnel at his disposal he decided the most logical approach, especially in high-profile games, was to instruct his team to sit deep and compact before springing to life on the counter-attack. Though this tactic didn’t help Chelsea climb the table in the league it did aid them in knockout competition where purity, and to some extents naivety, is often trumped by pragmatism. Of course, Bayern still had ample opportunities to triumph in Munich but Chelsea’s defensive display in the Camp Nou especially (where similarities with Mourinho’s Inter success were very apparent) was in stark contrast to those of most English teams throughout the season both in European competition and on their own shores.

Manchester City have this year won the league conceding 29 goals, almost double Chelsea’s record, and a tally higher than the average over the last 10 years (25.7) . Perhaps fittingly the newly-crowned Champions also scored the most goals yet the word ‘United’ rather than ‘City’ could well have been inscribed on the Premier League trophy had the red half of Manchester defended with a collective cohesion in the dying minutes at home to Everton. Nevertheless, in the end the trophy was won (or lost) on goal difference and for this reason it’s impossible to forget the 6-1 between the two sides earlier in the season. Had Manchester United not been so cavalier against City that day perhaps the ending of this tumultuous season might have been different.

Open, expansive football may conjure excitement but it doesn’t necessarily get results. As ever, a balance is needed. An ability to attack and defend as one. For most teams the elusive search for balance continues.

Many thanks to Opta (@OptaJoe) for their continued provision of stats galore.

If you enjoyed this piece you can follow me on twitter ~> @hazzaboy21


Time to say adieu to Abou?

Abou Diaby is a player who has divided opinion ever since his transfer from Auxerre in the January transfer window of ’06. Being a tall, French, black central midfielder he came with the inevitable tag of ‘The Next Vieira’ but it was evident from early on he was unlike our former captain in many ways. As he does with many players fresh to the squad, Arsène Wenger integrated Abou into the starting XI slowly and positioned him on the flank when he did so. Here, he was able to show unexpected trickery and a languid style outside the furiously-paced Premier League engine room. Out wide he could develop somewhat out of the limelight. Mistakes would be less costly there. He would be given more time to adapt.

Things were going quite well for Abou. He scored his first Arsenal goal in a 5-0 rout of Aston Villa and was beginning to make more of a difference in matches. Unfortunately, that promising start would be brought to an abrupt end on May 1st at the Stadium of Light. Dan Smith’s injury-time tackle that day left Abou with a fracture dislocation of his right ankle. He would be out for 9 months.

Sadly for Abou this would be the first of many injuries he’d suffer in his stop-start career to the extent that up till now he’s had to endure another 31 injuries of varying severity. That’s roughly 5 a year. It was even rumoured that after the new Medical Centre at London Colney was built a wing would be named after Diaby seeing as he knew the medical staff so well. The validity of these rumours may be tenuous…

Despite his plethora of injuries it seemed as if the 09/10 season might have been a turning point for our man made of glass. Calf and knee problems around the turn of the year hindered him slightly but for the majority Abou was making his familiar driving runs on a regular basis now positioned in the heart of midfield. His long galloping stride would leave opponents for dead at times so much so that squint and you would’ve been forgiven for thinking we had never sold Paddy to i Bianconeri all those years ago. He managed 35 starts and 5 substitute appearances that season, scoring 7 goals in the process.

As is his luck, however, those numbers have not been replicated. I write this after seeing Abou, after yet another return, limp off the pitch at the Britannia Stadium as the final whistle blew. It has since emerged that he suffered a calf strain which will rule him out of the remaining two games of the season and the European Championships this summer (if he was in contention at all). His season has amounted to a grand total of only 117 minutes spread over 5 substitute appearances in all competitions. There’s no getting around the matter. That is a woeful total. So much so that the question must be asked: Is it time we moved our separate ways?

“Not a fragile footballer”? (L’Équipe)

While all fans lament his luck with injuries and some have bones to pick regarding his occasionally lackadaisical style of play which hinders our tempo at times, Diaby is a player who is held in high regard amongst his peers. Laurent Blanc, manager of the French National Team, has stated that he’s “an incredible player” and that if fit he would “want to bring him to the Euros.” Sadly it doesn’t look like this will happen. Club teammate Bacary Sagna takes that hyperbole on further with his opinion that “without injuries Diaby would surely be the best French footballer.” High praise indeed but of course we must face reality. The injuries have been there.

Diaby’s assertion earlier this year that he is not fragile certainly would have raised a few eyebrows amongst fans. While this may be the case in his own mind unfortunately the facts paint a story quite to the contrary. He seems to be in a perpetual state of battling back to full fitness. The worry is that there’s no simple fix for his predicament. Theo Walcott suffered a number of shoulder dislocations in his early days at the club yet procedures on both cured the issue. Despite many operations Abou shows little signs of improvement.

“I have had three operations on my ankle, all for different problems but the result of that was that my body is unbalanced, especially in my legs.I have overused one over the other and to put everything back in place is not easy.Today my ankle is twice as big because of the surgery. My problem is a biomechanical problem. I need to work daily on how to rebalance my body.”

A by-product of his multitude of injuries has been fear. He admits that has been the case in the past:

“I have to say that last season I feared a bit to play. It was so important for me to come back to my best level and to avoid getting injured again that I had this little apprehension.”

It would only be natural given his lack of game time that this fear would still be pervading his play. Fear can cripple reflexes and the Premier League can be unforgiving to individuals slow in both thought and in body. Every failed comeback would be a mental blow as much as a physical one making each subsequent return that little bit more difficult than the last. It’s a potentially infinite cycle.

Arsenal supporters are certainly no strangers to injury-prone players. In fact, it has unfortunately become tradition for a member of the first team squad to be absent for the majority or whole duration of the season in recent years. Diaby and those in favour of keeping him at the club would likely argue that the likes of Tomáš Rosický and our prolific captain Robin van Persie were in a similar position to him in the past. I accept that they have suffered from recurrent muscular injuries during their time at the club and *touchwood* have put those issues behind them but I’d argue that neither have had the same extent of surgery as Diaby. His case is far more extreme.

Careful, Abou!

As long as he possesses this ‘injury-prone’ tag Abou will not be an attractive prospect to any potential buyer. His talents are clear but, and I’m stating the obvious here, they are useless to a club if he is forever on the treatment table. In previous years this may not have been such a problem. Before the 25-man squad rule was implemented in the Premier League clubs could hoard as many players as they saw fit. Now, however, there is pressure on efficiency of squad numbers. Diaby takes up both an over 21 and non-homegrown spot in the squad which could easily be filled by a player who, and I realise this sounds harsh, could actually contribute to the team’s performance on the pitch. Arsenal Football Club’s main interest, as stated in the name, is football not medical care.

So, what are our options?

Sell him. However, as I’ve mentioned previously due to his situation there would be few prospective takers.

Mutual termination of contract. Diaby still has 3 years left on a reported £60,000 per week deal. It’s highly unlikely that this option would materialise.

Persevere. Continue as we are with the hope that eventually his days on the sidelines will end.

Loan. A compromise of sorts. Any prospective loan would likely involve Arsenal subsidising a certain proportion of his wages but would also make him a slightly more attractive prospect to interested clubs. There’s no guarantee that a loan spell would result in an upturn in fortune but it would act as an intermediary option that may suit all parties.

Regardless of the option Arsène decides on this summer I think we can all agree that Diaby deserves a huge change in luck. Whether he gets that is another matter but he seems more determined than ever to make sure he fulfils his undoubted potential. I leave you with a few words from the man himself:

 “I have never been as motivated as I am now. I want to prove to everybody, and especially to myself, that I can do it. I have faith in what I am doing. I will never give up and I know that I will come out of this tunnel.”

I certainly hope you do, Abou.

If you enjoyed this piece you can follow me on twitter ~> @hazzaboy21